Lexington
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.14)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Lexington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study > Negative Result (0.67)
- Education > Educational Setting (1.00)
- Government > Military (0.93)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Logic & Formal Reasoning (0.90)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.14)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Lexington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Georgia > Fulton County > Atlanta (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Government > Regional Government (0.68)
- Leisure & Entertainment (0.67)
- Government > Military (0.46)
- Europe > Sweden > Skåne County > Malmö (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Middlesex County > Piscataway (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Lexington (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.72)
- Health & Medicine (1.00)
- Government > Military (0.95)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Agents (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Explanation & Argumentation (0.83)
BlendedNet++: A Large-Scale Blended Wing Body Aerodynamics Dataset and Benchmark
Sung, Nicholas, Spreizer, Steven, Elrefaie, Mohamed, Jones, Matthew C., Ahmed, Faez
Despite progress in machine learning-based aerodynamic surrogates, the scarcity of large, field-resolved datasets limits progress on accurate pointwise prediction and reproducible inverse design for aircraft. We introduce BlendedNet++, a large-scale aerodynamic dataset and benchmark focused on blended wing body (BWB) aircraft. The dataset contains over 12,000 unique geometries, each simulated at a single flight condition, yielding 12,490 aerodynamic results for steady RANS CFD. For every case, we provide (i) integrated force/moment coefficients CL, CD, CM and (ii) dense surface fields of pressure and skin friction coefficients Cp and (Cfx, Cfy, Cfz). Using this dataset, we standardize a forward-surrogate benchmark to predict pointwise fields across six model families: GraphSAGE, GraphUNet, PointNet, a coordinate Transformer (Transolver-style), a FiLMNet (coordinate MLP with feature-wise modulation), and a Graph Neural Operator Transformer (GNOT). Finally, we present an inverse design task of achieving a specified lift-to-drag ratio under fixed flight conditions, implemented via a conditional diffusion model. To assess performance, we benchmark this approach against gradient-based optimization on the same surrogate and a diffusion-optimization hybrid that first samples with the conditional diffusion model and then further optimizes the designs. BlendedNet++ provides a unified forward and inverse protocol with multi-model baselines, enabling fair, reproducible comparison across architectures and optimization paradigms. We expect BlendedNet++ to catalyze reproducible research in field-level aerodynamics and inverse design; resources (dataset, splits, baselines, and scripts) will be released upon acceptance.
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.14)
- North America > United States > Texas > Tarrant County > Grapevine (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Lexington (0.04)
- (9 more...)
- Aerospace & Defense (0.94)
- Transportation > Air (0.93)
- Energy (0.68)
Signature vs. Substance: Evaluating the Balance of Adversarial Resistance and Linguistic Quality in Watermarking Large Language Models
Guo, William, Uchendu, Adaku, Smith, Ana
To mitigate the potential harms of Large Language Models (LLMs)generated text, researchers have proposed watermarking, a process of embedding detectable signals within text. With watermarking, we can always accurately detect LLM-generated texts. However, recent findings suggest that these techniques often negatively affect the quality of the generated texts, and adversarial attacks can strip the watermarking signals, causing the texts to possibly evade detection. These findings have created resistance in the wide adoption of watermarking by LLM creators. Finally, to encourage adoption, we evaluate the robustness of several watermarking techniques to adversarial attacks by comparing paraphrasing and back translation (i.e., English $\to$ another language $\to$ English) attacks; and their ability to preserve quality and writing style of the unwatermarked texts by using linguistic metrics to capture quality and writing style of texts. Our results suggest that these watermarking techniques preserve semantics, deviate from the writing style of the unwatermarked texts, and are susceptible to adversarial attacks, especially for the back translation attack.
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Lexington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Kane County > Aurora (0.04)
Doppler Invariant CNN for Signal Classification
Bagchi, Avi, Hutchenson, Dwight
Radio spectrum monitoring in contested environments motivates the need for reliable automatic signal classification technology. Prior work highlights deep learning as a promising approach, but existing models depend on brute-force Doppler augmentation to achieve real-world generalization, which undermines both training efficiency and interpretability. In this paper, we propose a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture with complex-valued layers that exploits convolutional shift equivariance in the frequency domain. To establish provable frequency bin shift invariance, we use adaptive polyphase sampling (APS) as pooling layers followed by a global average pooling layer at the end of the network. Using a synthetic dataset of common interference signals, experimental results demonstrate that unlike a vanilla CNN, our model maintains consistent classification accuracy with and without random Doppler shifts despite being trained on no Doppler-shifted examples. Overall, our method establishes an invariance-driven framework for signal classification that offers provable robustness against real-world effects.
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Lexington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Alaska > Anchorage Municipality > Anchorage (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Lexington (0.05)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.05)
- North America > United States > Oregon > Multnomah County > Portland (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
SEVIR: A Storm Event Imagery Dataset for Deep Learning Applications in Radar and Satellite Meteorology Mark S. Veillette
Modern deep learning approaches have shown promising results in meteorological applications like precipitation nowcasting, synthetic radar generation, front detection and several others. In order to effectively train and validate these complex algorithms, large and diverse datasets containing high-resolution imagery are required.
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Lexington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- South America (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (0.68)
- Transportation > Air (0.68)
- Transportation > Infrastructure & Services (0.46)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Lexington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Georgia > Fulton County > Atlanta (0.04)
Aircraft Collision Avoidance Systems: Technological Challenges and Solutions on the Path to Regulatory Acceptance
Katz, Sydney M., Moss, Robert J., Asmar, Dylan M., Olson, Wesley A., Kuchar, James K., Kochenderfer, Mykel J.
Aircraft collision avoidance systems is critical to modern aviation. These systems are designed to predict potential collisions between aircraft and recommend appropriate avoidance actions. Creating effective collision avoidance systems requires solutions to a variety of technical challenges related to surveillance, decision making, and validation. These challenges have sparked significant research and development efforts over the past several decades that have resulted in a variety of proposed solutions. This article provides an overview of these challenges and solutions with an emphasis on those that have been put through a rigorous validation process and accepted by regulatory bodies. The challenges posed by the collision avoidance problem are often present in other domains, and aircraft collision avoidance systems can serve as case studies that provide valuable insights for a wide range of safety-critical systems.
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Washington > King County > Seattle (0.04)
- North America > United States > Utah (0.04)
- (15 more...)
- Research Report (0.81)
- Overview (0.54)
- Transportation > Infrastructure & Services (1.00)
- Transportation > Air (1.00)
- Government > Regional Government > North America Government > United States Government (1.00)
- (2 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Robots > Autonomous Vehicles (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.47)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.46)